ASC Review: Thick Thews, Brutish Brows & Heaving Bosoms

My apologies: turns out we had one more of these that I didn't notice until a day ago (Ben gave me a heads up about it getting left off the initial list, but I'd been too busy to check my DMs till then). Let's get right to it:

Thick Thews, Brutish Brows & Heaving Bosoms (Rook)

OD&D adventure for PCs of levels 4th & 5th

This one bills itself as a Frank Frazetta inspired caveman lair...which it is. But at 12 encounter areas (Dyson Logos map) it's still in the solid range of an "adventure site."

This one has decent ideas, but it's not as tightly themed as it could be...despite the size, it really is just a "lair:" almost everything encountered is going to be a "cave person" (caveman or cavewoman). There are multiple interesting ideas stashed here, all of which can be seen as "Frazetta" (read "pulp paperback") inspired, but they don't quite go together. We have (for example) the three eyed demon deity with its mutant tyranasaurus avatar AND the black pudding, river god that are both getting sacrifices (not to mention the green aura'd cave painting guy with the green slime behind it and the ancestor wizard/preserved skeleton hanging from the ceiling). I feel like...PICK ONE, dude, and build your scenario around THAT.

But, then, if you do that all you're left with is a caveman lair. Which is too small. See the problem?

So instead, you have disjointed stuff going on. The chaotic shaman who's turning the tribe. You have some cavewomen who are plotting to leave (??) while others ar gleefully taking part in sacrificing and tormenting sacrificial victims. You have these primitive-type beings that can only hoot and howl and raid the homo sapient villages for "buxom" sacrifices, but then you have others that can speak broken common and who keep a stash of thousands of gold pieces on hand to "trade with outsiders." These are all great ideas, but there are (for my taste) TOO MANY. You don't throw every pulpy idea in the book into the thing. I mean, you CAN, but this can prove jarring to players in play...like defeating a hydra, opening a door and finding a mind flayer. Yeah, both monsters are in the same level range, both are weird and hostile, but do they really go together?

Are we negotiating and faction-building with primitives OR are we stamping out demon worshippers while avoiding godlike retribution OR are we rescuing buxoms from deluded primitive worshipping a giant slime pool? You see what I mean? Or not? Maybe you're just like, hey, it's all fun. Okay. Kick-in-the-door D&D is a thing and some players don't overthink it. For me, I see some things that could be tightened to make this a real wowser.

2HD cavemen (and 1HD cavewomen) aren't too tough for PCs of this level but there are a LOT of them, which makes the challenge about right. I have no problem with the encounters except the zombie head which while (again) a neat idea is problematic in a number of ways...if you think about it (some people won't). Like, why is it attacking as a 2 HD creature? How can it actually move (albeit with a MV of 0.5) AND still attack? Do all zombie pieces have individual animating force in their various limbs or is this guy just special? And who/how was it created? Is this a creation of Ooooogun the witch-doctor (whose spells, HD and hit points aren't listed)?

There's a few things left out here. Blank spaces that appear to need to be filled in by the DM (these should be filled in by the adventure writer). Info on the witch-doctor and the chief's younger brother. Stats for the tyrannosaur (not a monster in OD&D...and where is it sleeping?). Ditto the giant snake.

There is too much treasure, even assuming a party of eight PCs (OD&D adventures tend to run easy with a higher number of players)....if you're only running with 4 or 5 it'll be even more. Most of the treasure items are "big ticket" items (gems and jewelry instead of coins and goods), and none of it is particularly difficult to discover or retrieve. You've close to 70K in treasure for something that should probably be under 40K. Very few magic items, though the chief has a +1 sword and +1 shield that are sufficiently famous as to have names and are identifiable by a sage (??)...no explanation given, and a little odd considering the primitive nature of the "tribe."

This one gets ** because it's incomplete and requires work on the part of the DM before it's fit to run. But it's a HIGH two stars, and it while just filling in blanks and providing stats for the various monsters would get it an extra star, tightening the theme could boost it into the 4* range...possibly higher. There's a lot of good "Frazetta fantasy" in this one, and while caveman tribes don't fit into every campaign, this one's the best and most well done that I remember seeing.

Also: check out Jean Auel's Clan of the Cave Bear sometime.

; )

ASC3 Wrap-Up & Thoughts

Yesterday rolled out the last of my ASC3 reviews, reviews that I finished writing some weeks ago. This post (yes, the one you're reading right now...) was written many days later, giving myself some time and space to think about the contest as a whole.

Not that I've done a lot of that. I'm a busy guy and I've been exceptionally busy since the holidays finished in early January. "Non-stop" is the phrase that comes to my head...for most of these reviews, I read and wrote them in BUNCHES...huge, heaping piles of them...in order to get through my obligation as a judge. At times, it was a bit of a slog, and I'd guess that (as much as anything) contributed to the curtness of some of these reviews.  For those who wanted MORE feedback, I've done my best to provide extra thoughts in the comments section of each entry. For those who'd prefer a more private forum for complaining or questioning my methodology, I'm generally responsive to emails.

Overall, I was somewhat disappointed by the quality of the submissions this year. 'Course, it's not MY contest (Ben will be the final arbiter of what he feels is worthy of the compilation), but there seemed to be a real dearth of...what I would call..."complete" entries.  Lots of problems, and many of the adventures with the strongest creativity and best theming were often the ones that lacked proper execution. Some of the two-star entries had me more jazzed/excited than the handful of four-star entries...which shouldn't happen. But it did. And none of the adventure sites (in my opinion) warranted a five-star rating. Not one...despite receiving nearly 40 entries this year.

The types of entries was also a little disappointing. Of the 38 adventure sites, eight were written for AD&D and four were were written for some form of TSR Basic. That's less than one-third. Everything else was written for various retroclones or...other. Six for ACKS. Two for Seven Voyages. A Hyperborea, a Savage Swords. That's more for "non-D&D" than there was AD&D...what's up with that?

My question is not meant to be rhetorical. There's something going on here that is interesting. And, if you'll permit me, I'd like to speculate about it for a moment:

I enjoy the gaming community. But for me, the community is a secondary consideration to gaming. I already mentioned I'm a busy guy. Most of that "busy-ness" revolves around my family and all our various "stuff," very little of which involves gaming. Sports, music, socializing with (non-gamer) friends, school stuff, house stuff, day-to-day living stuff...this occupies the bulk of my time and attention. And it gives me a full life...a happy, satisfying life. The gaming stuff...which, for me, is a vocation and calling and a part of my basic identity...is always there. Like my eye color. Or my wedding ring. 

But the gaming community? I play game, I write games, I teach games. But games aren't a lifestyle for me. And I don't need to be immersed in the community of gamers to know what I'm about. 

And I am different from some gamers in this way. There are gamers...many gamers...who not only want this community but NEED it. They need to kabitz and be friends with likeminded folks who encourage them and validate them and accept them and relate to them. This is a HUMAN thing...we all "need" community to one degree or another to give us all these things. We are SOCIAL creatures; we do not enjoy being LONELY. 

Most of us. I've always been a little odd in that I like my solitude. But not always. And, generally speaking, I love people...gamers and non-gamers alike.

What does all that have to do with adventure writing? Gibson's contest is an on-line thing...something marketed to an on-line community. And those communities (like my blog readers, or Ben's) gravitate towards a particular type of gaming...an older style, an FAG-oriented style (what's now being called "classic"). And in larger community, you see vocal visionaries promoting particular games...games like ACKS and OSRIC and OSE, etc. And some gamers gravitate towards these vocal proponents, and a small handful becomes a small group and then a small community. Like-minded folks finding ways to be together with other humans.

And togetherness is something we all want and desperately, desperately need in these times.

The particular edition of D&D I play has a following, too...but it is older and more diffuse. Pocket tables (like my own) teaching and playing a game the same way  it's been done for 40+ years, long before "communities" and social platforms made networking dead simple. Geezers, in other words...geezers like myself who decry the way the hobby has disintegrated over the years but who (again, like me) can't be bothered to create a gravitational force that drags in folks searching for "community." AD&D is not a Church; a gaming session is not a Mass. For me, that is. For other people, the wider gaming community has replaced for them part of the thing that religion has done for so many people over the years. Provided a feeling of belonging. Provided a higher purpose outside themselves. Provided a way and a reason to bond with others.

All very good stuff. As I said: we're humans. Humans need this kind of stuff.

So while I'm disappointed not to see more AD&D adventure sites, I get it. And I'm okay with it...the "disappointment" I expressed was more personal than conceptual. I like AD&D...I'd like to see more AD&D adventures being written, published, play-tested. But it's a GOOD thing that we have so many people going out and creating...doing work...for the larger hobby. More entries this year than last year...Gibson's contest has grown with every season. That's fantastic. Because people need creative outlets and gamers need adventures and adventures writers are only going to get better the more they write, the more practice they get.

I look back at some of my own stuff, and I'm appalled at my earlier efforts.

Thank you to everyone who took the time and made the effort to participate in the Adventure Site Contest this year. Thank you for sharing your creativity; thank you for contributing to the hobby. Thank you for putting up with my slights and nit-picks and taking my sourness in stride. Thank you for making me THINK and READ and helped me sharpen and crystallize my own thoughts on design. And thank you for being an inspiration to others who haven't yet found the time...or the courage...to create their own adventures.

RPGs are meant to be played with others. By providing adventures, you provide more opportunities for people to play together. Appreciate you folks.

ASC Review: Pyramid of Peril

Patracleo's Peregrinating Pyramid of Peril (Matthew Lake)

Seven Voyages of Zylarthen adventure for three to six PCs of levels 5th-6th

I am reviewing these in the order they were submitted. For my review criteria, please check out this post. All reviews will (probably) contain *SPOILERS*; you have been warned! Because these are short (two page) adventures, it is my intention to keep the reviews brief.

Once again, Matthew Lake takes the final submission spot. Last year's entry was the best of the bunch and a decisive winner of the contest. This year? Well...

I'll make this brief, because I've already spent way too much time on this one. The idea here isn't bad: an undead AEgyptian princess zips around the world in her flying pyramid, picking up dummies to run a gauntlet/obstacle course for her immortal amusement. Okay, actually writing that out it looks worse than the concept actually is (I mean, D&D's premise isn't the greatest...). 

The problem with this one (well, my MAIN problem) is that A) it's written for Seven Voyages of Zylarthen, which requires some 'transduction' for me to grok, and B) the re-skinned monsters which need to be translated to 7VZ just so that I can translate them again to D&D terms. Which is a pain in the ass.

When I'm picking up a pre-written adventure for use at my table, I don't want UNDERSTANDING the module to be a "pain in the ass."

I will not quibble overmuch about 7VZ as an entry, because while NO, its system is NOT compatible with TSR-era D&D (its combat system functions differently), that doesn't matter terribly when looking at the adventure itself. All I see is "bugbear 12 HPs" or "gold ankh 500gp" or "save vs. spells or dance madly for 2-12 turns." These things all translate as "standard" D&D, and if you are playing this using OD&D, you don't need to know the funky 7VZ rules, nor does it matter that 7VZ doesn't use clerics or whatever.

No, the two biggest issues here are just monsters and treasures. 

All the damn re-skins. "Scarabites" as goblins. "Stag-Scarabites" as hobgoblins. "Bear-bugs" as bugbears. "Scarabite flyers" as...winged goblins, I guess? Infrared scarabs (invisible goblins). I mean, I get it, you've got a bug theme going on here. I'm trying to play D&D, and I keep seeing paragraphs full of unfamiliar mouthful of words and I have to remember if Rhino-Scarabs are the ones that get ridden (they are) or are those the Stag-Scarabs (no, they're the riders). Scarab-scarab-scarab...sheesh.

But that just makes the thing a headache to parse. The other issue is the treasure.

7VZ uses a "silver standard," which NO is NOT the same as an TSR-era edition of D&D but whatever, I can do math. So players have to SPEND money to earn x.p. (*sigh*) and they get 1 x.p. for every 1 silver piece spent. So, easy right? Just add up the s.p. value and treat it like g.p. for seeing if the treasure totals are good for this adventure, right?

Except that the author isn't CONSISTENT with his nomenclature. He gives some items' values in gold piece, some values in silver pieces, and then there are coppers thrown in the mix just to piss me off (because in Zylarthen, five CPs = 1 SP, meaning that UNLIKE normal D&D, 100K in copper is worth a phat score of 20K experience points, rather than just something to weigh down bodies in the river...). As a reviewer I have to assume that the author did not just typo his way through this thing and meant every scrap of loot to be worth its exact value which, besides being a pain in the ass, GROSSLY OVERVALUES the treasure yield of this adventure...should be 43K in silver and instead you've got 110K.

Of course, if you were just using it as an OD&D adventure than it's grossly UNDERvalued at a paltry 11K in gold pieces. Bleah.

Matthew, you did a great job last year, and you're a creative guy, but this one needs work. For me, it's not even playable...but I don't play Seven Voyages, even if it IS the "new hotness" amongst classic adventure gamers. However, some people do and...as with the ACKS submissions...I'll defer to other reviewers and simply mark this as *** assuming its appropriately functional (if over-treasured) for 7VZers.

The end.

ASC Review: Foggy Night to Forget

A Foggy Night to Forget (Jamie Henson)

BECMI/RC adventure for "all levels and groups from 1-99"

I am reviewing these in the order they were submitted. For my review criteria, please check out this post. All reviews will (probably) contain *SPOILERS*; you have been warned! Because these are short (two page) adventures, it is my intention to keep the reviews brief.

Welp we're down to the final two submissions; last year's ASC saw a couple real bangers at the end...can we hope for the same quality this time around? That the author thinks Basic edition PCs can get up to 99th level, does NOT bode well...

"A Foggy Night to Forget is as easy or hard as the DM decides..."

Mm. Okay, pal. On with the show!

Welcome to D&D meets Brigadoon! Albeit with less dancing.

Not going to lie...for all the issues with this one, I don't absolutely hate it. Maybe I have a soft spot for BECMI efforts; maybe I'm just addled after too many adventure reviews. But this one is...what? Touching? Charming? We have the quaint yet cursed hamlet that shows up on a foggy evening, drawing the PCs into its drama. Seems it's generally forced to reside inside a pocket dimension due to the irritation its inhabitants have caused Gloux, an Immortal of the Sphere of Thought (I don't know why, but part of me enjoys Mentzer's odd D&D cosmology...it's just so idiosyncratic from other forms of D&D), and they won't get released for realz until a murder mystery is solved. The author advises the adventure can be used as

"...a way to remove/kill PCs (of almost any power level -- a campaign-fix)..."

which is just so straight-up asshole, you have to be a tad impressed. It's like Trump telling people, yeah, we're just going to run Venezuela's oil from now on. Except, you know, more amusing and less mind-numbingly awful.

Sorry, sorry...digressions. A cursed, magic hamlet (a la Brigadoon) is about the perfect size for an adventure site, with its 11ish encounter areas. There's stuff going on (the curse, duh), people to interact with, factions to discover, mysteries to be plumbed. Heck, there's even a list of treasure to be found at each keyed location (on the off-chance to PCs just decide to bushwhack the townsfolk). There's whimsy here...from the god-spawned automaton that hangs out by the village well for no explained reason, to the pack of gator-men that are more hungry than hostile.

But "charming" as all that is, it's not really D&D play. This scenario basically assumes PCs are going  to be sucked into this railroad of a mystery-crawl, and then forced to dance till the DM says you're done...if ever (see the asshole bit above...). That's not real player agency...that't the illusion of agency. We (DMs) want PLAYERS to be EMPOWERED to be PROACTIVE when it comes to tackling adventures. This adventure tries to force players to care...which is about the worst thing to try to force on players. Especially in a ham-fisted way that relies on magical barriers of egress. 

Treasure is too little for "any number" of PCs of 36th level, let alone 99th (not a thing in this edition, by the way). Sure, there's a 800,000 g.p. "tristal" but clearly the author hasn't paid close enough attention to their Mentzer Companion Book 2 (or their Rules Cyclopedia) or they'd know that a tristal "may have any value from 1,000 to 100,000 gp." Probably just added an extra zero by mistake. The author's other stuff is good...although, they should have noted that "gator men" are found in AC9: Creature Catalogue (that took me a minute to figure out; a reference would have been handy).

Look, it's interesting, and it's got some fun stuff (like the vampire druid raising his army of level-sucking spiders). But its too dependent on its story for function...and that's a big no-no. This is ** with a "+" for potential. The disappearing village is a great idea for an adventure site, but don't make "solving" its curse the objective of play...instead, make it something fun that can be "unlocked" in the course of doing 'normal adventuring stuff' (i.e. kicking ass and taking loot). Design the thing for specific level and number of players. Don't tell DMs to adjust to their whim...DMs already do that (when we want to).

ASC Review: Ilthog the Twisted

Ilthog the Twisted (Joseph Griesel)

"1E adjacent" adventure for "four plus" PCs of levels "7+"

I am reviewing these in the order they were submitted. For my review criteria, please check out this post. All reviews will (probably) contain *SPOILERS*; you have been warned! Because these are short (two page) adventures, it is my intention to keep the reviews brief.

Appears this was written for use with the Hyperborea RPG which I don't know and don't care to know. I'll review this as a AD&D (until it breaks down) and judge whether or not it's "compatible" and playable.

Let's see...four or more PCs of levels 7+. So, then, this thing would be appropriate for eight or 10 or 12 adventurers using 10th or 14th or 20th level characters? Exciting!

Oh, I see...it's a nine room "lich lair."

[*read*read*read*]

Okay, this isn't terrible. The flameskull trap is pretty good (author credits this to Justin Todd). Damage could be upped on the pulverizing trap, but still okay (that's credited to Anthony Huso). The Type IV demon, "matter reconstitution chamber," "becoming nook," and false tomb are all pretty good.

Author credits Huso with bone golems, but these look directly cribbed from the Cook/Marsh Expert set (except in B/X bone golems are tougher: HD 8 and AC 2...use those instead, man).

The PROBLEM is the lich itself. Unless the Hyperborea RPG is radically different from AD&D (i.e. disqualifying it from the competition), a lich is a minimum level 18 spell caster. Firetrap in the alchemy lab? Needs to be upped. Lich's hit dice and spell abilities? Too paltry.

And treasure is WAY too low...about 40K total which wouldn't even be close if this place only expected four 7th level characters (90K). And, no, you don't get to say an intelligent sword of wounding is worth 30K. They're worth 22K...intelligence in a magic item is a mixed blessing (at best) and doesn't boost the price.  And what kind of suckers would invade a lich's sanctum just for a sword of wounding? Maybe a vorpal blade or holy avenger.

This one only gets ** but it gets a "+" for actually having a pretty swell little sanctum/adventure site with tight themes. A bit of clean-up (including designing FOR a specific group and level range) would go a long way toward making this a solid high-mid level adventure site. Yeah, there's potential with this one. Good use of larva, too, by the way.

ASC Review: Wraith's Pass

Wraith's Pass (Olle Skogren)

ACKSII adventure

I am reviewing these in the order they were submitted. For my review criteria, please check out this post. All reviews will (probably) contain *SPOILERS*; you have been warned! Because these are short (two page) adventures, it is my intention to keep the reviews brief.

The final ACKS adventure on the docket, thank the Lord. This one does not list how many adventurers or what levels it's been written for, simply writing:

How to Use This Module?

This is a mighty but lightly occupied border fortress of an evil realm. A conventional army will have a very hard time taking it in a siege, but commando action by heroes is possible. In a full scale war the fortress could be garrisoned by 1920 troops, a full brigade. It is also possible to run this as an independent mountain realm, add more forces that raid the surrounding lands and it becomes a sort of super-bandit fortress.

So....Do As Thou Wilt Is the Whole of the Law, I guess?

This has nine encounter areas spread over three maps that I find ugly, off-putting, and nearly indecipherable. I mean, I assume they are "decipherable," but I'm not taking the time to do so.

Not really sure this is an "adventure" site, but there's stuff to kill, and since I'm unqualified to judge a system where the "sorcerer-wraith" lists proficiencies of "Battle Magic," "Black Lore of Zahar," "Engineering," and "Military Strategy 2," I'll let other reviewers judge whether this is any good.

Assume it's "playable" ACKS. Three(ish) stars.

ASC Review: Bones of the Mountain

Bones of the Mountain (Jakob McFarland)

S&W adventure for PCs of 5th level

I am reviewing these in the order they were submitted. For my review criteria, please check out this post. All reviews will (probably) contain *SPOILERS*; you have been warned! Because these are short (two page) adventures, it is my intention to keep the reviews brief.

This one's okay. Starts out with a banger of a premise...feels very mythic/folklore. Seven wights ride down from the Black Mountain every full moon on the back of their giant wolves, carrying off women from the valley below; a mad Sherpa claims he can lead you to their dark fortress for 100 gold coins.

Site is biggish (18 encounter areas) but it is still a "small" fortress. Draugr are just "wights" in my book (literally in my book...if you read my Five Ancient Kingdoms, you'll find I've replaced the "wight" entry with "draug." Well, druj really...had to go all Zorastrian, after all...but draug is what the Northmen call them. Oh, yeah...here, too), but in THIS adventure they are:

Frozen undead soldiers. They shall be statted as zombies with 3HD.

What exactly does this mean to be "statted as zombies?" They don't share the same AC or HD as zombies. Does the author mean they can be turned as zombies? Do they always attack last like zombies?

The mythic/folklore feeling persists throughout the adventure and helps make any weirdness (the friendly werewolves, the illusion-generating spider) seem like part of some dark fairytale rather than gonzo bullshit. No, the real problem lies with the treasure count. The scenario doesn't say how many PCs it assumes, but seven seems about the right number and that would mean some 67K in treasure for a site this size. Instead, we get less than 20% of that as potential take...far, far too little.

McFarland's adventure is still playable D&D, and has got some nice theming going for it. But the treasure is way off and despite some pretty beefy encounters (the worgs, wights, and draugr are nasty), it could probably stand to contain one or two more threats/hazards. Three stars (***) with definite potential.