Playtest Results

So, somewhat surprisingly (given that I provided incredibly short notice to people) I had several players show up to last night's playtest.

Vance, Shaina, and Matt were all "older adults" (read: my age, give or take a decade) who were familiar with AD&D. No 5E players sat down at my table but, to be fair, I was a little late getting to the shop and by 6:20 (when I arrived) a lot of tables were already "full up." Matt, bless his heart, was there early waiting with beer in hand for my arrival. As soon as I pulled my 1E tomes from my backpack, he sauntered over to introduce himself.

Vance and Shaina arrived a few minutes later, having just seen my blog post about 20 minutes earlier (!!). I'd actually met them before, at the last DragonFlight convention I attended (2019, I think? Yep)...we'd all sat in on several games together. Anyway, it was both flattering and impressive that they'd show up at the drop of a hat, so I hope I gave them a good game.

[they did say they had a "fun time"]

The adventure was written for six to eight players, as that's the usual number to expect at a Cauldron table, so it was going to be a bit tougher for three. I made adjustments to one or two encounters, but for the most part they handled things in a fairly clever and cautious manner, successfully navigating some 15 out of 24 encounter areas (by "successful" I mean "surviving"). Vance lost two characters over the course of the session, including Bruti the dwarf (a pre-gen from Dwellers of the Forbidden City that I have made a staple of my pre-gens since Cauldron I)...the first time I've seen that character fall in battle. Unfortunately, Bruti was carrying most of the treasure they'd found so when they did decide to retire (being low on hit points and out of healing magic) the party ended up with little to show for their efforts; maybe something like 20,000 gold pieces worth? Out of a potential 500K+.

[due to "circumstances" Bruti's body...and the treasure...were unrecoverable. Mainly because the other party members fled the scene as quickly as possible]

SO...good times. A 40% mortality rate is, perhaps, a little higher than I'm looking for (20-30% is about right) but, again, they were working with a smaller party than expected. Over all, I'd say the group played competently. It will be interesting to compare their results with my own play group (the kids) next Friday; they'll have four players, including one complete newbie (a never-played-before friend of Sofia's). 

Should be fun. Or a bloodbath. Or both.

ANYway...I am slightly (slightly!) disappointed that I didn't get any 5E players at the table; I was expecting to have to give my "conversion spiel" to folks, and missing that opportunity feels, in retrospect, somewhat like...well, like a missed opportunity.  But, yeah, that was my own fault for not giving enough notice (on the shop's discord channel and elsewhere). I was contacted by more than a few people (via email) who had interest in playing but already had other plans for the evening.

I promise that NEXT TIME I'm running a public game (and I hope to run at least three more playtests before the con in October) I'll let people know a couple weeks in advance. 

Now I just need to finish writing those three adventures.

; )

Thank you very much to Matt, Shaina, and Vance. I really appreciate you folks coming out and playing...it made my evening!

Playtest

Tonight I'll be running D&D for (presumably) random strangers.

I've finished writing the tournament module for the 2025 Cauldron convention and need to test it. Around the Table Game Pub in Edmonds has an open table "D&D" night on Wednesdays from 6pm till close, and they've told me there's space for me to run a game. 

We'll see if anyone shows up.

[I am suddenly reminded of the first time I tried to run a B/X game at my...now defunct...local game shop and having no one appear. When was that? Oh, yeah: August 8th, 2010, almost 15 years ago. Perhaps history will repeat itself...at least this time I was able to leave a couple messages on the shop's discord channel]

My own players (my kids) want me to run the game for them next Friday (when we have their friends over for a sleepover) and I will, but as this is the tournament adventure for the con -- and will be run by more DMs than just myself -- I'd like to get it tested as early and often as possible before I release it 'into the wild.' 

One VERY interesting thing: the "open D&D night" is open to all editions of the game but MOST people that show up are running/playing 5E. Taking a 1E adventure to Cauldron (where the people are expecting 1E) or running the game for my players (who know what to expect) is going to be a different experience from having to "re-train" 5E players on the fly. Yeah...I'm very interested to see how this turns out.

Hopefully, people will show up.

Regardless, I'll post a follow-up telling how things went.

; )

"Deat JB" Mailbag #37

Dear JB:

I think I'm going to give up, I'm running a campaign where I made everything really nice, the world map, the cities, stories, dungeons, enemies, but my table doesn't cooperate. The players are my friends, a barbarian, a cleric, a druid and a bard, but they don't collaborate with the campaign, they always make jokes out of character, they make secret metagames, and this all comes from the bard, druid and barbarian, the cleric is the only one who seems to really want to play, I'm thinking about killing their characters in the next session and making a new world from absolute zero, do I do that?

I Will Give Up

Dear IWGU:

Let me see if I have a full understanding here...

1. You've create a world map, cities, dungeons, "stories" (I'll assume you mean adventure situations), and enemies for your campaign. 
2. You're so annoyed by your players that you've all but decided to chuck it all in the bin and start over from scratch (after "killing their characters").

Why on earth would you do something so idiotic? 

I'll get to your "annoying" players in a second, but the only reason to bin a campaign world is because you are dissatisfied with the campaign world. You can ALWAYS find new players...why throw away the work and effort you've already expended? You should be expanding and developing your world, making it deeper and richer, not re-booting. Even if there are things you dislike about your game world, you fix them, you modify, you make adjustments. Why O why would you burn everything down? Are you a child craving attention that you must throw a self-destructive tantrum? Are you going to start cutting on yourself next? 

Dude: grow up. 

Your complaint is that your players "don't collaborate with the campaign" which, frankly, is nonsensical. D&D is NOT a collaborative game. YOU are the Dungeon Master: you create the world, you manage the campaign. Their is no "collaboration." Let's be clear: the definition of collaborate is

"to work jointly on an an activity, especially to produce or create something"

No. You are the Dungeon Master. YOU are the one who does the work with regard to producing/creating the campaign.

If you are laboring under the misapprehension that D&D is somehow a game of "collaborative storytelling," let me burst that bubble right now. It's not. Regardless of what the marketing says. You can TRY to make it that, but you will fail and be miserable more often than not, because it is POORLY DESIGNED for that style of play, mainly because it still bears the fruit of the seeds sown by the original designers and it was never the intention of the original designers to create a collaborative storytelling game. There are other RPGs one can buy that are designed that way, and that function well for that purpose, but D&D isn't one of them, period, end of story.

You want collaborative storytelling? Join a writing club.

You complain that your players "make jokes out of character" and "make secret metagames" (not so secret if you know about it) and imply this is evidence that three of the four don't "really want to play." Are you kidding me? The fact that they metagame implicitly signals that they are engaged with the game as a game...they absolutely want to play! One can only engage with the game in a "meta" fashion by knowing and understanding the game's rules and systems...do you not read all the complaints from DMs about players incapable of grasping or understanding game rules, even after YEARS of play?

And to make jokes is human. You will find all players do this at one time or another. If you're going to let that bug you to the point of quitting, than you're probably not cut out for the job of being a DM.

SO, to sum up: your complaint is nonsensical and your proposed response is childish. You ask the question "do I do that?" referring to killing the player characters and starting the campaign from scratch, and my answer to you is: this would accomplish nothing. 

Presumably, your players would still continue to be humans who are interested in engaging with and playing D&D, so how would re-building the (imaginary) world change that? What...do you think they are so attached to their PCs that this action would be punitive in the extreme and "teach them a lesson" in how to play the way you want them to play? If that's what you think, you're a jackass who doesn't understand the first thing about Dungeons & Dragons. 

Rather than waste your time and effort accomplishing nothing, I'd strongly recommend quitting D&D altogether and finding a creative outlet more suitable to what you want to do. Become a playwright, or start an improvisational theater troupe, or write your fantasy fiction serial using all the "nice" content material you originally hoped to purpose for your D&D campaign. Keep your friends as friends and enjoy their company around board games or video games where (hopefully) their natural human behaviors with regard to game playing won't annoy you.

But stop playing D&D. You're doing it wrong anyway.

Sincerely,

JB

"Dear JB" Mailbag #36

This one's from last week; just a little too busy to wrap up my response till now...

Dear JB:

Ok forgive me this is my first post, I was recently in a game with a player I had been the DM for before, he was always a little off and had apparently left multiple Discord Servers because of problem DMs (im now starting to think he was the problem). So for Context we were in a battle and I had cast a spell that had a lingering damage effect and the DM had a magic book that had fallen open that had a Wild Magic effect that would go off every round. Well I forgot once about my lingering damage and brought it up (prob a bit later than I should have i admit) and the damage caused an enemy that had been put to sleep to wake up, which upset said problem player, then without thinking I also reminded the DM about his wild magic effect when he forgot (my mind was ooh maybe we will get one of the funny effects). Problem player proceeded to "whisper under his breath" I hate you. We ended up winning the battle.

A few days later I get a two paragraph message of problem player going off on me saying I was purposely trying to sabotage the party, and its the players job to call out the DM on things because all DMs cheat and try to kill the players because they get tired of their NPCs dying. I didnt know how to respond so I screen shotted the message to ask a friend of mine and he sent be a bunch of stuff that when I read it was what I was basically trying to say. I sent him that and he proceeded to tell me my friend was toxic for saying that the Players and DM should work together to make the game fun because all DMs are against the players, and its our jobs as players to be antagonistic towards the DM and call them out on everything. So I told everyone in the server we were in that I was leaving and why, and that apparently upset him even more.

Oh I had also mentioned to him I "Cheated" as he called it when I DM were I fudge the rolls occasionally so I dont kill the players because Id rather they live and have fun then a total party wipe, which upset him even more. Next thing I know hes on Roll20 posting on my LFG posts telling players they should not join or leave my game because I cheat. I Deleted his posts and blocked him on everything.

Player Believes All Games Are DM Vs Player

Dear PBAG:

All D&D games ARE "DM versus player." That's part of the gig.

Look: the player you're talking about sounds like a reactionary, paranoid asshole (though, to be fair, I'm only hearing your side of the story). But just because he's semi-delusional and a bit of a misanthrope doesn't mean he's not speaking some truth here.

For instance, if you "fudge" dice rolls as a DM, you ARE a cheater with no respect for the game you're playing...no ifs, ands, or buts about it. But we've all sinned at one time or another and you can certainly STOP doing that, and you can (in the future) be a fine and upstanding Dungeon Master who understands the disservice such cheating is. 

But leave all that aside; let's talk about your actions as a player. Reminding the DM of a particular rule or effect that happens to benefit the opposition facing the players isn't "sabotaging" the party...rather, it's just you trying to win under the parameters of the game you're playing (some might call that "winning the right way"). 

If you're playing poker and the dealer accidentally gives you an extra card, the proper recourse is to say "um, you dealt me too many cards." Choosing to instead use the mistake to your advantage is a form of cheating. Calling attention to the misdeal isn't "sabotaging" yourself...it's saying, whoa, let's get this right, rather than have a hiccup call into question everything that comes after (like who wins the money in the pot, who gets forced from the table, how that affects future deals, etc.).

On the other hand, it's not unusual for a referee in a sporting event to "miss a call" here or there, and the prevailing attitude of most players is simply let's play on, regardless of whether or not the call went their way or not. In a fast-paced game (which can include D&D, especially during combat) mistakes occur on occasion...and yet, over the course of the match such errors USUALLY aren't the difference between victory and defeat.  Usually.

That being said, D&D is very different from a football match. While the players could certainly be Team A on the pitch, the DM would be Team B and the referee and the league commissioner all at the same time...hardly a "fair" contest that!  But that's the game, and that's the job, and the thing that helps make it "fair" is that the rules provides some explicit instruction about how to arbitrate the game in an impartial manner, and the game has systems in place that provide the means for DMs to gauge the scale of challenges in relation to the players' ability. 

Plus: characters can always get raised or wished back to life.

So while the player you're complaining about was a little nutso to call your friend "toxic," I would still have called your friend woefully misguided if he truly believed that "the Players and DM should work together to make the game fun." No, this is inaccurate (or, more specifically, only accurate in the broadest sense of, sure, every human should be working to make the world a better place). No...that's not how D&D works.

Should players be "antagonistic" towards a DM and "call them out on everything?" No! Heavens, no! If the players are having to "call them out" that implies a deep mistrust of the DM's authority and capability...and D&D only functions when that trust exists!  

I repeat (because it's important): D&D only functions when trust in a DM's authority and capability exists. 

But the reason that trust is necessary for a functioning game is specifically because ALL D&D games are "DM versus Player." The DM is the opposition. The DM is the adversary. The DM is the provocateur and antagonist. The DM is the challenge. Each and every game of D&D pits the players against the DM...because the DM isn't just the league commissioner and referee, they are also the other team on the field.

Every game.

The crazy player that you blocked is correct in this regard. But, unfortunately, he appears to have no trust is DM's capabilities to DM in the manner they're supposed to (i.e. with fairness and impartiality). Why this is...who can say? Perhaps he's had DMs in the past that abused him, or that abused their authority; perhaps he has experienced abuse from other authority figures and now projects that distrust on all such individuals, including Dungeon Masters. Perhaps he's just played in too many "rigged" games with DMs inclined to "fudge" (cheat) in an arbitrary manner as they feel best befits the outcome they prefer, dice be damned.

Regardless, he seems to be suffering from some sort of PTSD, which is very sad. Sad because it is very hard to ever find contentment or joy when you lack trust. Distrust is a fast road to fear, and fear is a blockade, not just to action and creativity, but to feelings of security and satisfaction. Hopefully. the player in question has managed to compartmentalize his distrust, and only applies it in the gaming realm. Hopefully.

Now, back to you, PBAG. You wrote:

"So I told everyone in the server we were in that I was leaving and why, and that apparently upset him even more."

Huh? What?

You quit your game? Because a player expressed a belief that you tried to "sabotage" the party (false) and that your friend's everyone-works-together-for-fun attitude is "toxic" (also false)? You just detailed all this misanthropic behavior from a player that you clearly seem to disagree with, and then instead of standing up for you convictions you fold like a paper cup? What kind of lily-liver coward are you?

Seriously: why the hell are you even writing this letter? You just quit? 

Jesus. Go play CandyCrush or something. You don't have the stomach for D&D.

Sincerely, 

JB

Scheduling Conflicts

Let's just dive right in.

In slum-bagging it through the ol' Reddit detritus for a cheap-ass "Dear JB" to write, I am constantly assailed with post after post of people bitching about "scheduling:" how hard it is to get a day and time set when EVERYone can attend, or moaning and complaining when people miss a session or drop out because of rando stuff like "work" or "school" or "family."

*sigh*

Once upon a time, we lived in a world where there were far less concerns pressing down on us for our time and attention. There was no internet, no YouTub, no streaming services, no 5 billion different TV shows and movies to watch "on demand." There were no smart phones, no SnapChat, no Instagram, no "Meta," no discord channels to surf for hours on end. There were no pay-to-play phone games that ate up every last free minute that we might have to otherwise use for...oh, I don't know...THOUGHTS and REFLECTIONS or SIMPLE DAYDREAMING. The kind of stuff that would lead to ideas that one could work into their D&D game.

We lived in a simpler age where children were not being trained as polymaths, with music lessons and athletic activities and language classes all going on Every Night Of The Week. Instead you were either a "sporty kid" (with a couple of practices per week and a game on the weekend) OR some sort of arty kid (with a weekly piano lesson or acting class or something) and pretty much no other obligations aside from school, an hour of spiritual worship (pick your religion), and maybe a night of Boy Scouts or Campfire or whatever.

TIME. That precious commodity. We have given away So Much Of It over the years. I know I have...and my family as well. Now it's just a struggle...a struggle to find time to exercise (because it's good for me), to find time to sleep (because it's good for me), to find quality time with my family (because it's good for me), to find time to pursue my own ambitions and creative endeavors (because they're good for me, too). 

Where to fit gaming into this mix? There's not enough hours in the day.

Our time on this planet as humans is finite. We get (roughly) 120 years allotted to us, and this gets reduced considerably by our lifestyle choices...to the point that if we can cross the 90 year mark, most of us are celebrating like we won the lottery (and those last 15-20 years can be fairly burdensome ones to get through, depending on overall health). Those years are broken up into seasons filled with months filled with days and nights filled with hours...and many of those hours are accounted for, just for the sake of the necessaries of keeping us alive. We must sleep, frustrating as that may be...in a million years of evolutionary adaptation, no mutation has come along that keeps us from needing to spend one-third of our lives in an unconscious state.

SO...16 hours a day, 7 days a week for a grand total of 112 hours. Say you spend 40 hours of that on your "job" (whatever that is), 4 hours a day (28 total) on food preparation and consumption, another eight hours per week on bathroom activities (including bathing, grooming, teeth, waste elimination), three hours per week on "moderate exercise" (a bit more than recommended for optimal health but whatever), and, say, another 8 hours for home cleaning / maintenance (varies depending on division of labor in the household, need for lawn care, etc.). Of course some people commute (let's go five hours per week), and maybe you have a weekly "movie night," play, or sporting event with your family or roommates as a bonding activity...call that four hours. That leaves you with...what...16 total hours? That's a full day, right?

But, of course, it's never that easy. And even with those (fairly conservative) estimates time just keeps on slippin-slippin-slippin into the future. The only way you can guarantee your D&D game will happen is if YOU, Mr./Ms, DM makes it a priority to happen. 

Give yourself a four hour window. Pick a day and time that works for you Every Single Time, and commit to that. You don't schedule other activities that day. You plan your daily routines AROUND that time. You honor that time slot the same way you would honor any other important commitment...the same way you would with, say, your job or a university class. You put it on the calendar...weekly, semi-weekly, monthly, whatever...and you stick to it. And when the time comes up, you sit down in your seat (wherever that seat might be) prepared to run the game. 

That's how it works. Long term, that's the ONLY way that works. This haphazard, catch-as-catch-can method of tooling around everyone's schedule, making adjustments on the fly, etc. is all just exhausting, non-productive NONSENSE...and it will, eventually, derail your campaign, no matter how much effort you apply to "making it work."  

The session day/time only has to work for one person: the Dungeon Master. Without the DM, there's no game so, guess what? The DM is the priority.

Once you have your set session date, you inform your potential players of the date. And the players can decide if it works for their schedule, and whether or not the DM's game (YOUR game) is going to be a priority for their busy-busy lives. And maybe it won't be. Maybe they're not available on Thursdays from 6pm to 10pm. Maybe they have church obligations on Sunday mornings. Maybe their kid's soccer club takes them out of town on a lot of Saturdays and that's just not in the cards for them.

That's okay. You're not running a D&D game for your players. You're running D&D because you love it and you want to run it. 

If that's NOT the case...well, heck, I don't know what I can tell you. I love running D&D for my kids...Love! It!...but I don't run D&D for THEM. I run D&D because I love running D&D. If they did not want to play (because they have other obligations, priorities, friends, whatever), I would still run D&D. Because I love running D&D. I ran it before they were born. And I plan to run it even after they've moved out of the house and have lives (and, perhaps, D&D campaigns) of their own. 

It's not about the players. A solid, committed Dungeon Master can always get new players.

So, then, what happens if you HAVE players but one or more of them don't show up to the game? What do you do then?

Easy. When that happens, you just run the game for the players you do have.

As said, the players really don't matter. I don't design adventure scenarios for specific players...I just design adventure scenarios. My mind is on the world and the scenario, NOT on how the players will interact with it. I can't predict how the players will interact. I can't anticipate what they'll do when/if bad luck strikes and (for example) kills the cleric. Will the players abandon the dungeon? Roll up a new cleric? Decide to hire the village priest (because now Bob wants to play an illusionist or something)? Who knows? Who cares? 

Not I. 

I don't worry a whit about what PCs Sally and Bill and Terry are bringing to the session. What concerns me is the part of my game world they're in, and what adventures are open to them in that part of the game world. These days, my players (kids) tend to head "straight to the dungeon" (as soon as they can locate one)...in my youth, my players would futz about a bit more in town, getting into trouble or pursuing various ambitions. All that's fine...eventually their wallets will be empty enough that they'll start looking for some loot-filled adventure or quest. All their grandest schemes (generally) require money anyway. Just as in real life. My job is to make sure there are things for them to do (i.e. adventures) because I'm the DM running the thing and that's my responsibility as a DM.

So it doesn't matter to me whether Sally blows off the session because she's got a date that night, or is writing a term paper or whatever. Sally's character won't be available to the party (because Sally's not available), but the rest of the players can still posse up and trek out to the dungeon. Sally's PC is "off doing something" (sleeping off a drunk, or shacked up with some dude, or meditating at the abbey, or whatever)...adventurers, like their players, are a notoriously flaky bunch. The question isn't "where's Sally's character," but rather "what do Bill and Terry want to do?" Sally's PC can always 'catch up later.'

But what about players skipping a session in the middle of an adventure?

Ah, yes...always a possibility as, depending on how a session goes, it is not unusual for me to end a session with the PCs still two levels underground in some (probably corpse strewn) chamber, bagging coins from some newly discovered treasure chest. This is COMMON...I don't force players to 'return to town' at the end of sessions, and for long adventures (like the D-series of modules or some plane-traipsing extravaganza) such a return trip might be practically infeasible. So then: how do you, DM, explain when the next session opens and Bill can't make it because he came down with the flu? His ranger was bagging gold with the rest of the party at the end of last session, what now?

Again, easy enough: the ranger has gone missing. He stepped outside the chamber to answer the call of nature, or eat some rations without being assaulted by the smell of dead hobgoblin, and got turned around and lost somewhere in the dungeon. While the rest of the party sets about exploring (i.e. participating in the adventure) THIS session, Bill's ranger is hiding and/or wandering trying to find his way back to the party, avoiding wandering monsters, and trying not to get killed. Hopefully, Bill the player will be back to full health by the following session, and the ranger can "rediscover" the party...either in the dungeon or back in town.

But what happened to Bill's ranger "off screen?" Nothing of import. He fought nothing. He found nothing. He expended no resources. Maybe he used a torch...and subsequently found a replacement. Through ranger craftiness or blind, stinking luck he somehow managed to avoid combat and confrontation, and avoided falling prey to a trap. Perhaps he was paralyzed with fear and simply didn't move around much. Perhaps he knows the old ranger adage "when you get lost, stay in one place" and just waited for the other party members to find him. Who knows? But GAME-WISE he did nothing to warrant any change in his character sheet with regard to hit points, experience points, treasure tallies, nada. Somehow, his character just "lucked out."

And if Bill actually quits the game...say, he gets a job that precludes him from re-joining the Tuesday evening session the DM has scheduled...then something terrible has befallen his character. It was eaten by a wandering otyugh or something. Them's the breaks.

[unless the DM wants to use Bill's character as an NPC, of course]

You see, it really doesn't matter whether or not a player or three skip a session; the D&D game is not about individual players. Frankly speaking, the D&D game is not "about" anything at all. The D&D game is just a game. As a DM, I run the game, and I get the great joy that such a creative endeavor brings. The players? They just get to play...if they show up.

Now I understand that a lot of folks who learned the game in a post-DragonLance era are going to have difficulty shifting their brain into the proper mindset because (since DL) so much ink has been spilled and words vomited proclaiming that D&D is "telling a story." And all stories are "about" something. And usually that thing they're "about" are the characters in the story. And you see how THAT logic...built on a faulty premise...leads one to the (wrong-headed) conclusion that the players (or, at least, their characters) are necessary to play the game.

Nothing could be farther from the truth.

The only thing that's necessary to play the game is a Dungeon Master, armed with the proper tools (rule books, dice, etc.). Got it? The ONLY thing. So as far as scheduling "conflicts" are concerned there's only one person whose time and availability matters. 

D&D is an activity...a powerful activity that has the ability to forge bonds of friendship between people. But the game isn't necessary for those bonds to be sustained...people can remain friends long after their time and participation in the game has ended. We make the mistake of thinking that these relationships we create through the activity are contingent on continual engagement with the activity...that we will LOSE our friends if we don't find a way to make the game work for everyone to play. This is inaccurate. As we move through life, we encounter different people in many different activities and environments: at jobs, at school, at clubs, at church, at events, in sports teams, etc. Some of the people we encounter "stick" with us...for whatever reason...and become part of our social circle. And just because we change jobs, leave school, quite the team, etc. doesn't mean we LOSE these friends...we can still see them, and interact with them, as much as works for our (finite amount of) time. It's not the schedule that matters; it's the prioritization of engagement. 

Don't fear loss. Embrace the friends you have. And make MORE friends, build MORE relationships, while engaging in the various activities (like D&D) that you do.

Happy Thursday, folks.

: )

"Dear JB" Mailbag #35

Still in Mexico and having a great time...

Dear JB:

My sample size isn't dozens and dozens, but I do DM for more than one group. A really sad pattern I've seen from my players over the last few years is fewer and fewer players having actually read the fucking rules. And I don't mean cover to cover. I mean, they haven't read the just the main section of rules for Ability Scores, Combat, and Spells. Those 20 ish pages give you everything you need to actually play DnD beyond reading your personal race and class, and yet more and more players (especially if they are 25 y.o. or younger in my experience) just haven't actually sat down and read the rules. This is doubly true if they got their first exposure through a DnD show or podcast. And this isn't just for new players either. I've had people playing for months and months who, even after deciding they like DnD and want to keep playing have never actually figured it out. Don't actually know what the numbers on their sheet mean. Can't read a spell block. I can't think of any other game where anyone would tolerate playing with someone for months who has never actually read the rules. I've tried to enforce it, and yet no one wants to. So we tolerate the pseudo-understanding of the rules. Instead of sitting down and really understanding it all from day 1, we get constant slowdowns each session from rules confusion. I'm just frustrated. Rant over. 

 Tl:dr Old man shakes fist at illiterate zoomers

No One Reads The Rules Anymore

Dear NORTRA:

So f'ing what?

I've had people with zero experience sit down at my table many times over the last four decades. We make characters and we get them up to speed and then we play the game. Those who enjoy the game will return and play again (when invited, of course); those who love the game will go out and buy the book(s) and read the rules, so that they're informed.

We are talking about players here, right? I often joke (well half-joke) that players are a lazy lot. And they ARE...in comparison to the Dungeon Master. It is imperative that the DM knows the rules because the DM is the conductor and arbiter of the game. The Dungeon Master does the bulk of the work of the game, certainly all the 'heavy lifting' (creating and running scenarios). It's not that players are stupid or incapable; many are very intelligent and very capable. But they don't have the burden of responsibility that a Dungeon Master has. 

That being said, there is a reason that players who -- after trying the game a few times and deciding they love it and want to continue playing it -- go out and buy the books and read the instructions. It is because they want to get better at playing, and having knowledge gives them more power. Power to overcome the consequences of playing a challenging game.

So, NORTRA, let me ask: Is your game challenging? Is it consequential?

Because I'll tell you this: my game is. Players who walk around my world, blissfully unaware that their actions have consequences, usually DIE. Often badly. 

That is to say, their characters die, of course...characters being the avatar and vehicle by which the player interacts with the game world. Presumably you play 5E, so you are probably operating under a myriad of misapprehensions about what D&D is and the objectives of play and whatnot, mainly because the publishers (Wizard of the Coast) don't care whether or not people understand the game or even read the rules, so long as they BUY the rules and put money in their coffers (*ka-ching!*). 

As such (that is, because of those misapprehensions), it is quite possible that you DON'T run a challenging, consequential game. Because 5E play is not about challenging players these days, and it's not about enforcing consequences, certainly not for poor play. With its "death saves" and required "player consent"...are you kidding me? The 5E DM is expected to be a dancing monkey for the players, and it sounds like what you're running up against is that you don't like being a dancing monkey for a bunch of lazy slackers who (suffering no consequences for their ignorance) can't be bothered to lift the smallest finger when it comes to making the game run smoothly.

So, "old man," my advice to you is to run a different game, preferably 1st Edition Advanced Dungeons & Dragons. As the Dungeon Master, YOU get the say over what system you run. It shouldn't matter to players who don't read the instruction manual anyway, and if they bitch and moan just point to the 5E PHB where it says:

The D&D rules help you and the other players have a good time, but the rules aren’t in charge. You're the 5e DM, and you are in charge of the game 

 Ultimately, the Dungeon Master is the authority on the campaign and its setting, even if the setting is a published world

And the 5E DMG where it says:

the DM interprets the rules and decides when to abide by them and when to change them

Then tell the players: "I am exercising my authority as a 5E Dungeon Master to change the entirety of the system to conform with 1st edition AD&D rules."

Once you've done that, you'll find it far easier to manage the game: the instruction you need to give the players (when they fail to read the rules) are plenty easy to explain, and you'll have far more time for world building and adventure creation...the main draws for a person wanting to be a Dungeon Master. What's more, the AD&D rules can be downright punishing to players who fail to learn or give effort; you will soon cull your table of those who wish only to be "tourists" of the D&D game, and instead you'll find yourself with quality people striving to refine their skills and improve the campaign as a whole.

Sincerely,

JB

"Dear JB" Mailbag #34

I am in Mexico for the next couple weeks; expect posting to be light, as I am using the time to chill out.

Dear JB:

My players never keep track of their abilities. Sometimes they jot down one number with no context on their character sheet, after i tell them to keep track. Other times they tell me "i'll just remember it", and they forget either in the same session or definitely by the next. I've been telling them for months to keep track. This one time they asked me whether i had any feedback for them. The one thing i told them is to start keeping track.

Next session, i plan to ask my players at the start how many spell slots/other "per long rest" resources they have left. The players that don't answer correctly are not allowed to use them.

Is this too harsh? All it takes is writing down the ability names on your phone and changing the numbers after you've used them. Should i do something else? How would you handle this?

Am I Overreacting?

Dear AIO:

Generally speaking, the data recorded on a player's character sheet is theirs to do with as they want. As the Dungeon Master, it is your duty and responsibility to keep your own record of pertinent game resources, such as hit points, experience points, and accumulated treasure.

Here's how I do it:

I keep a spreadsheet for all PCs and henchfolk (NPCs) in the players' party. This records their accumulated x.p., treasure, maximum HPs and current HPs. During the session, I do not use my laptop, but I do have a pad of notebook paper on which I keep notes, especially regarding damage sustained by PCs in the game. I also have a printout of the adventure I'm using (if any) on which I track enemies defeated and treasure found. 

At the end of a game session, I take the notes from my notepad and from my (printed) adventure and update my spreadsheets on the laptop, keeping a running total of accumulated data. I then inform the players of their new x.p. totals, treasure totals, etc. which they can choose (or not) to record on their character sheets. If a PC has gone up in level we roll the new HPs, choose new spells, etc. either then or before commencing play in our next session.

Most abilities and spells in AD&D have a finite use; so it's fairly easy for me to rememeber whether or not a player has already used their "lay on hands" (or whatever) class feature for the day. In my house game, I only allow one use of (non-cleric) spells so, again, I don't have to worry about a MU having "multiple sleep" spells or something...they get one such use, and afterwards, they get nothing before sleeping for the night. Easy-peasy. With regard to clerics, I keep a tally on the same notepad as HPs, so I know when a PC has reached their limit of 1st level (cure light wounds) spells, or whatever. If the session ends mid-day (game time) and we intend to pick up where we left off, I make notes for myself to remember what abilities might still remain for when we start our next session.

I expect the players to keep their own notes as well and, for the most part, they do...players like to know when they are running low on spells and hit points, or when they are getting closer to advancing in level. However, I do not rely on players to track pertinent game records for me...doing that would be shirking my responsibility as Dungeon Master, and inviting a plethora of chaos into my game.

AIO, I understand that you are running a different type of D&D, with "long rests" and class resources and whatnot, but the principal remains the same: it's not the players' job to run the game, it's YOURS. This is the game you've chosen to run, now you have to deal with the consequences of that decision by responsibly and diligently tracking your PCs' (game-affecting) resources. 

That doesn't mean you coddle the players: if they forget that they have a skill, or forget that they have already used it up (and then get killed because they were relying on it to be there), that's on the player, not the DM. The player has the responsibility for knowing the limits of the character they're playing, and the character sheet is the way they have for tracking those limits and abilities. If they don't exercise the opportunity to keep track of their own notes, then they'll suffer the consequences.

However, as the Dungeon Master, YOU need to know where the PCs stand at any given time as well, so that if a player DOES want to do the responsible thing and asks "how many more times can I cast heal?" you can inform them "you have X number of castings left."

See how that works?

So, are you "overreacting," AIO? Clearly, your proposed intention of upending the normal rule procedure as a punitive measure is extreme. But (sadly) I don't think your reaction is particularly atypical: frustration with players' lack of interest and unwillingness to engage with the game and its systems seems to be a 'standard rant' of many would-be DMs these days. I'd even go so far as to speculate that this frustration is one of the reasons so many modern DMs revert their game to a "basic" system (like OSE) or throw out rules willy-nilly, instead simply "winging" game play in aid of not ruining the "fun."

Sad, I say. 

Own your power, AIO. Assert your authority by taking the reins of responsibility and running a tight ship. Build a consequential world with imperative situations that force your players to engage...or suffer. Demand quality game play by holding everyone at the table...including yourself...accountable. Not by being arbitrary, but by running the game as designed.

Sincerely,

JB